Sid Fox Sid Fox's Profile Page

Sid Fox Sid Fox

0 Course Enrolled • 0 Course Completed

Biography

Free PDF Quiz 2025 Trustable ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager: Pass PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27005 Risk Manager Guaranteed

While attempting the exam, take heed of the clock ticking, so that you manage the PECB ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Questions in a time-efficient way. Even if you are completely sure of the correct answer to a question, first eliminate the incorrect ones, so that you may prevent blunders due to human error.

PECB ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Exam Syllabus Topics:

Topic
Details

Topic 1

Information Security Risk Management Framework and Processes Based on ISO
IEC 27005: Centered around ISO
IEC 27005, this domain provides structured guidelines for managing information security risks, promoting a systematic and standardized approach aligned with international practices.

Topic 2

Other Information Security Risk Assessment Methods: Beyond ISO
IEC 27005, this domain reviews alternative methods for assessing and managing risks, allowing organizations to select tools and frameworks that align best with their specific requirements and risk profile.

Topic 3

Fundamental Principles and Concepts of Information Security Risk Management: This domain covers the essential ideas and core elements behind managing risks in information security, with a focus on identifying and mitigating potential threats to protect valuable data and IT resources.

Topic 4

Implementation of an Information Security Risk Management Program: This domain discusses the steps for setting up and operationalizing a risk management program, including procedures to recognize, evaluate, and reduce security risks within an organization’s framework.

>> Pass ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Guaranteed <<

Quiz PECB - Fantastic Pass ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Guaranteed

Life will always face a lot of choices. When we choose to work, we will also be selected by the job in reverse. And today, in an era of fierce competition, how can we occupy a place in a market where talent is saturated? The answer is a certificate. What the certificate main? All kinds of the test PECB certification, prove you through all kinds of qualification certificate, it is not hard to find, more and more people are willing to invest time and effort on the ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Study Materials, because get the test ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager certification is not an easy thing, so, a lot of people are looking for an efficient learning method. And here, fortunately, you have found the ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager study materials, a learning platform that can bring you unexpected experiences.

PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27005 Risk Manager Sample Questions (Q25-Q30):

NEW QUESTION # 25
Scenario 4: In 2017, seeing that millions of people turned to online shopping, Ed and James Cordon founded the online marketplace for footwear called Poshoe. In the past, purchasing pre-owned designer shoes online was not a pleasant experience because of unattractive pictures and an inability to ascertain the products' authenticity. However, after Poshoe's establishment, each product was well advertised and certified as authentic before being offered to clients. This increased the customers' confidence and trust in Poshoe's products and services. Poshoe has approximately four million users and its mission is to dominate the second-hand sneaker market and become a multi-billion dollar company.
Due to the significant increase of daily online buyers, Poshoe's top management decided to adopt a big data analytics tool that could help the company effectively handle, store, and analyze dat a. Before initiating the implementation process, they decided to conduct a risk assessment. Initially, the company identified its assets, threats, and vulnerabilities associated with its information systems. In terms of assets, the company identified the information that was vital to the achievement of the organization's mission and objectives. During this phase, the company also detected a rootkit in their software, through which an attacker could remotely access Poshoe's systems and acquire sensitive data.
The company discovered that the rootkit had been installed by an attacker who had gained administrator access. As a result, the attacker was able to obtain the customers' personal data after they purchased a product from Poshoe. Luckily, the company was able to execute some scans from the target device and gain greater visibility into their software's settings in order to identify the vulnerability of the system.
The company initially used the qualitative risk analysis technique to assess the consequences and the likelihood and to determine the level of risk. The company defined the likelihood of risk as "a few times in two years with the probability of 1 to 3 times per year." Later, it was decided that they would use a quantitative risk analysis methodology since it would provide additional information on this major risk. Lastly, the top management decided to treat the risk immediately as it could expose the company to other issues. In addition, it was communicated to their employees that they should update, secure, and back up Poshoe's software in order to protect customers' personal information and prevent unauthorized access from attackers.
According to scenario 4, Poshoe has identified its assets, vulnerabilities, and threats associated with its information systems. What does the company need in order to start identifying its existing controls?

A. A list of all existing and planned controls
B. The risk treatment implementation plan and documentation of controls
C. A list of incident scenarios with their consequences

Answer: A

Explanation:
To start identifying its existing controls, Poshoe needs a list of all existing and planned controls. This list will provide the necessary baseline to understand what security measures are already in place and what measures are planned to mitigate risks. This helps in determining gaps, evaluating the effectiveness of current controls, and identifying areas requiring improvement. Option A (The risk treatment implementation plan and documentation of controls) is incorrect because it is too specific and assumes a level of completion not indicated in the scenario. Option C (A list of incident scenarios with their consequences) is incorrect as it pertains to the analysis phase of risk management, not the identification of existing controls.

NEW QUESTION # 26
Scenario 6: Productscape is a market research company headquartered in Brussels, Belgium. It helps organizations understand the needs and expectations of their customers and identify new business opportunities. Productscape's teams have extensive experience in marketing and business strategy and work with some of the best-known organizations in Europe. The industry in which Productscape operates requires effective risk management. Considering that Productscape has access to clients' confidential information, it is responsible for ensuring its security. As such, the company conducts regular risk assessments. The top management appointed Alex as the risk manager, who is responsible for monitoring the risk management process and treating information security risks.
The last risk assessment conducted was focused on information assets. The purpose of this risk assessment was to identify information security risks, understand their level, and take appropriate action to treat them in order to ensure the security of their systems. Alex established a team of three members to perform the risk assessment activities. Each team member was responsible for specific departments included in the risk assessment scope. The risk assessment provided valuable information to identify, understand, and mitigate the risks that Productscape faces.
Initially, the team identified potential risks based on the risk identification results. Prior to analyzing the identified risks, the risk acceptance criteria were established. The criteria for accepting the risks were determined based on Productscape's objectives, operations, and technology. The team created various risk scenarios and determined the likelihood of occurrence as "low," "medium," or "high." They decided that if the likelihood of occurrence for a risk scenario is determined as "low," no further action would be taken. On the other hand, if the likelihood of occurrence for a risk scenario is determined as "high" or "medium," additional controls will be implemented. Some information security risk scenarios defined by Productscape's team were as follows:
1. A cyber attacker exploits a security misconfiguration vulnerability of Productscape's website to launch an attack, which, in turn, could make the website unavailable to users.
2. A cyber attacker gains access to confidential information of clients and may threaten to make the information publicly available unless a ransom is paid.
3. An internal employee clicks on a link embedded in an email that redirects them to an unsecured website, installing a malware on the device.
The likelihood of occurrence for the first risk scenario was determined as "medium." One of the main reasons that such a risk could occur was the usage of default accounts and password. Attackers could exploit this vulnerability and launch a brute-force attack. Therefore, Productscape decided to start using an automated "build and deploy" process which would test the software on deploy and minimize the likelihood of such an incident from happening. However, the team made it clear that the implementation of this process would not eliminate the risk completely and that there was still a low possibility for this risk to occur. Productscape documented the remaining risk and decided to monitor it for changes.
The likelihood of occurrence for the second risk scenario was determined as "medium." Productscape decided to contract an IT company that would provide technical assistance and monitor the company's systems and networks in order to prevent such incidents from happening.
The likelihood of occurrence for the third risk scenario was determined as "high." Thus, Productscape decided to include phishing as a topic on their information security training sessions. In addition, Alex reviewed the controls of Annex A of ISO/IEC 27001 in order to determine the necessary controls for treating this risk. Alex decided to implement control A.8.23 Web filtering which would help the company to reduce the risk of accessing unsecure websites. Although security controls were implemented to treat the risk, the level of the residual risk still did not meet the risk acceptance criteria defined in the beginning of the risk assessment process. Since the cost of implementing additional controls was too high for the company, Productscape decided to accept the residual risk. Therefore, risk owners were assigned the responsibility of managing the residual risk.
Based on scenario 6, Productscape decided to accept the residual risk and risk owners were assigned the responsibility of managing this risk.
Based on the guidelines of ISO/IEC 27005, is this acceptable?

A. No, the top management should manage the residual risk
B. Yes, risk owners must be aware of the residual risk and accept the responsibility for managing it
C. No, risk approvers are responsible for managing the residual risk after accepting it

Answer: B

Explanation:
ISO/IEC 27005 specifies that once a risk treatment has been applied and residual risk remains, it is essential that the risk owner is aware of this residual risk and accepts the responsibility for managing it. The risk owner is the individual or entity accountable for managing specific risks within the organization. In Scenario 6, Productscape decided to accept the residual risk and assigned risk owners the responsibility for managing it, which is fully compliant with ISO/IEC 27005. Thus, the correct answer is A.
Reference:
ISO/IEC 27005:2018, Clause 8.6, "Risk Treatment," which states that risk owners should be aware of and accept responsibility for managing residual risks.

NEW QUESTION # 27
Scenario 6: Productscape is a market research company headquartered in Brussels, Belgium. It helps organizations understand the needs and expectations of their customers and identify new business opportunities. Productscape's teams have extensive experience in marketing and business strategy and work with some of the best-known organizations in Europe. The industry in which Productscape operates requires effective risk management. Considering that Productscape has access to clients' confidential information, it is responsible for ensuring its security. As such, the company conducts regular risk assessments. The top management appointed Alex as the risk manager, who is responsible for monitoring the risk management process and treating information security risks.
The last risk assessment conducted was focused on information assets. The purpose of this risk assessment was to identify information security risks, understand their level, and take appropriate action to treat them in order to ensure the security of their systems. Alex established a team of three members to perform the risk assessment activities. Each team member was responsible for specific departments included in the risk assessment scope. The risk assessment provided valuable information to identify, understand, and mitigate the risks that Productscape faces.
Initially, the team identified potential risks based on the risk identification results. Prior to analyzing the identified risks, the risk acceptance criteria were established. The criteria for accepting the risks were determined based on Productscape's objectives, operations, and technology. The team created various risk scenarios and determined the likelihood of occurrence as "low," "medium," or "high." They decided that if the likelihood of occurrence for a risk scenario is determined as "low," no further action would be taken. On the other hand, if the likelihood of occurrence for a risk scenario is determined as "high" or "medium," additional controls will be implemented. Some information security risk scenarios defined by Productscape's team were as follows:
1. A cyber attacker exploits a security misconfiguration vulnerability of Productscape's website to launch an attack, which, in turn, could make the website unavailable to users.
2. A cyber attacker gains access to confidential information of clients and may threaten to make the information publicly available unless a ransom is paid.
3. An internal employee clicks on a link embedded in an email that redirects them to an unsecured website, installing a malware on the device.
The likelihood of occurrence for the first risk scenario was determined as "medium." One of the main reasons that such a risk could occur was the usage of default accounts and password. Attackers could exploit this vulnerability and launch a brute-force attack. Therefore, Productscape decided to start using an automated "build and deploy" process which would test the software on deploy and minimize the likelihood of such an incident from happening. However, the team made it clear that the implementation of this process would not eliminate the risk completely and that there was still a low possibility for this risk to occur. Productscape documented the remaining risk and decided to monitor it for changes.
The likelihood of occurrence for the second risk scenario was determined as "medium." Productscape decided to contract an IT company that would provide technical assistance and monitor the company's systems and networks in order to prevent such incidents from happening.
The likelihood of occurrence for the third risk scenario was determined as "high." Thus, Productscape decided to include phishing as a topic on their information security training sessions. In addition, Alex reviewed the controls of Annex A of ISO/IEC 27001 in order to determine the necessary controls for treating this risk. Alex decided to implement control A.8.23 Web filtering which would help the company to reduce the risk of accessing unsecure websites. Although security controls were implemented to treat the risk, the level of the residual risk still did not meet the risk acceptance criteria defined in the beginning of the risk assessment process. Since the cost of implementing additional controls was too high for the company, Productscape decided to accept the residual risk. Therefore, risk owners were assigned the responsibility of managing the residual risk.
Based on scenario 6, Productscape decided to monitor the remaining risk after risk treatment. Is this necessary?

A. Yes, the remaining risk after risk treatment should be monitored and reviewed
B. No, unless the risk has a severe impact if it occurs, there is no need to monitor the risk
C. No, there is no need to monitor risks that meet the risk acceptance criteria

Answer: A

Explanation:
ISO/IEC 27005 advises that even after risks have been treated, any residual risks should be continuously monitored and reviewed. This is necessary to ensure that they remain within acceptable levels and that any changes in the internal or external environment do not escalate the risk beyond acceptable thresholds. Monitoring also ensures that the effectiveness of the controls remains adequate over time. Option A is incorrect because all risks, including those meeting the risk acceptance criteria, should be monitored. Option B is incorrect because monitoring is necessary regardless of the perceived severity if it occurs, to detect changes early.

NEW QUESTION # 28
Scenario 3: Printary is an American company that offers digital printing services. Creating cost-effective and creative products, the company has been part of the printing industry for more than 30 years. Three years ago, the company started to operate online, providing greater flexibility for its clients. Through the website, clients could find information about all services offered by Printary and order personalized products. However, operating online increased the risk of cyber threats, consequently, impacting the business functions of the company. Thus, along with the decision of creating an online business, the company focused on managing information security risks. Their risk management program was established based on ISO/IEC 27005 guidelines and industry best practices.
Last year, the company considered the integration of an online payment system on its website in order to provide more flexibility and transparency to customers. Printary analyzed various available solutions and selected Pay0, a payment processing solution that allows any company to easily collect payments on their website. Before making the decision, Printary conducted a risk assessment to identify and analyze information security risks associated with the software. The risk assessment process involved three phases: identification, analysis, and evaluation. During risk identification, the company inspected assets, threats, and vulnerabilities. In addition, to identify the information security risks, Printary used a list of the identified events that could negatively affect the achievement of information security objectives. The risk identification phase highlighted two main threats associated with the online payment system: error in use and data corruption After conducting a gap analysis, the company concluded that the existing security controls were sufficient to mitigate the threat of data corruption. However, the user interface of the payment solution was complicated, which could increase the risk associated with user errors, and, as a result, impact data integrity and confidentiality.
Subsequently, the risk identification results were analyzed. The company conducted risk analysis in order to understand the nature of the identified risks. They decided to use a quantitative risk analysis methodology because it would provide more detailed information. The selected risk analysis methodology was consistent with the risk evaluation criteri a. Firstly, they used a list of potential incident scenarios to assess their potential impact. In addition, the likelihood of incident scenarios was defined and assessed. Finally, the level of risk was defined as low.
In the end, the level of risk was compared to the risk evaluation and acceptance criteria and was prioritized accordingly.
Did Primary perform risk analysis in accordance with the guidelines of ISO/IEC 27005? Refer to scenario 3.

A. No. according to ISO/IEC 27005, the risk level should be determined during risk evaluation
B. No, the gap analysis should have been conducted during risk analysis, as suggested by ISO/IEC 27005
C. Yes, according to ISO/IEC 27005. the consequences, likelihood, and the level of risk should be determined during risk analysis

Answer: C

Explanation:
ISO/IEC 27005 specifies that risk analysis should involve determining the potential consequences (impact) and the likelihood of identified risks, which together form the basis for calculating the level of risk. In Scenario 3, Printary followed this approach by assessing potential incident scenarios, determining their impact, evaluating their likelihood, and finally defining the level of risk. This process is aligned with the guidelines of ISO/IEC 27005 for conducting a thorough risk analysis. Therefore, Printary performed the risk analysis in accordance with the standard's guidelines, making option C the correct answer.
Reference:
ISO/IEC 27005:2018, Clause 8.4, "Risk Analysis," which outlines the steps to analyze risks by determining their consequences, likelihood, and overall level of risk.

NEW QUESTION # 29
Scenario 8: Biotide is a pharmaceutical company that produces medication for treating different kinds of diseases. The company was founded in 1997, and since then it has contributed in solving some of the most challenging healthcare issues.
As a pharmaceutical company, Biotide operates in an environment associated with complex risks. As such, the company focuses on risk management strategies that ensure the effective management of risks to develop high-quality medication. With the large amount of sensitive information generated from the company, managing information security risks is certainly an important part of the overall risk management process. Biotide utilizes a publicly available methodology for conducting risk assessment related to information assets. This methodology helps Biotide to perform risk assessment by taking into account its objectives and mission. Following this method, the risk management process is organized into four activity areas, each of them involving a set of activities, as provided below.
1. Activity area 1: The organization determines the criteria against which the effects of a risk occurring can be evaluated. In addition, the impacts of risks are also defined.
2. Activity area 2: The purpose of the second activity area is to create information asset profiles. The organization identifies critical information assets, their owners, as well as the security requirements for those assets. After determining the security requirements, the organization prioritizes them. In addition, the organization identifies the systems that store, transmit, or process information.
3. Activity area 3: The organization identifies the areas of concern which initiates the risk identification process. In addition, the organization analyzes and determines the probability of the occurrence of possible threat scenarios.
4. Activity area 4: The organization identifies and evaluates the risks. In addition, the criteria specified in activity area 1 is reviewed and the consequences of the areas of concerns are evaluated. Lastly, the level of identified risks is determined.
The table below provides an example of how Biotide assesses the risks related to its information assets following this methodology:

According to the risk assessment methodology used by Biotide, what else should be performed during activity area 4? Refer to scenario 8.

A. Monitor security controls for ensuring they are appropriate for new threats
B. Create a strategic and operational plan
C. Select a mitigation strategy for the identified risk profiles

Answer: C

Explanation:
In Activity Area 4 of the risk assessment methodology used by Biotide, the focus is on identifying and evaluating risks, reviewing the criteria defined in Activity Area 1, and evaluating the consequences of identified areas of concern to determine the level of risk. However, an essential part of completing a risk assessment process also includes determining appropriate mitigation strategies for the identified risks.
ISO/IEC 27005 provides guidance on selecting and implementing security measures to manage the risk to an acceptable level. Therefore, selecting a mitigation strategy for the identified risk profiles is a crucial next step. This involves deciding on controls or measures that will reduce either the likelihood of the threat exploiting the vulnerability or the impact of the risk should it occur. Thus, the correct answer is B.
Reference:
ISO/IEC 27005:2018, Section 8.3.5 "Risk treatment" outlines the process of selecting appropriate risk treatment options (mitigation strategies) once risks have been identified and evaluated.

NEW QUESTION # 30
......

However, when asked whether the ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager latest dumps are reliable, costumers may be confused. For us, we strongly recommend the ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager exam questions compiled by our company, here goes the reason. On one hand, our ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager test material owns the best quality. When it comes to the study materials selling in the market, qualities are patchy. But our PECB test material has been recognized by multitude of customers, which possess of the top-class quality, can help you pass exam successfully. On the other hand, our ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Latest Dumps are designed by the most experienced experts, thus it can not only teach you knowledge, but also show you the method of learning in the most brief and efficient ways.

ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Test Score Report: https://www.itcertking.com/ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager_exam.html

Sid Fox Sid Fox

Biography

Quick Links

Resources

Support